A peaceful revolution is "politics".
Public.icon
Reflections on the French Revolution
Conservatism
Gradualism
I'm going to do politics tkgshn.icon*9
/emoji/twitter.icon #Ankichi's Room Takagi-kun's earlier talk (revolution through intellectual approach), in a democratic society, I feel like thinking in terms of prisoner's dilemma doesn't necessarily work, but I'm curious about the contents of the book that say "maybe this is a good way to do it!" It just piqued my interest.
@FPC_COMMUNITYFPC_COMMUNITY.icon July 22, 2021
I was talking about how there is no need to do a revolution, but what is needed is politics. That leads to What is conservatism?, and in the context of "Isn't it only smart people who can do that?", I understand that.
Regarding the mention of prisoner's dilemma, if it is a rule that no one can keep, it is meaningless and becomes a lawless area.
I understand the argument that "as a result, those who keep it will lose" prisoner's dilemma.
Probably Takagi-kun and Fureki are confused about their recognition of prisoner's dilemma. FPC_COMMUNITY.icon
Even if you try to take revolutionary action, if you do it intelligently, you have no choice but to follow the current political system, which is democracy. FPC_COMMUNITY.icon
Even if it is a wonderful action, if the people do not have interest or sympathy for it and vote in an egotistical way, it seems difficult to have an intellectual approach to revolution, right? That's the intention of the original Fureki's tweet, which mentions that "catering to the masses becomes an incentive (populism)", and the word democracy comes up? Previous companies, interviews and appearances related to oneself.icon
Here, democracy is strictly a matter of system, and examples of indirect democracy through elections, which are currently being held in Japan, can be cited. I hadn't thought about whether to cater to the masses or not, but if we want to have a revolution with an intelligent approach while preserving the current form of democracy, realistically speaking, we need to at least win an election or pass a bill through a majority vote in the Diet. But isn't that difficult? (referring to the previous discussion) That's the intention. FPC_COMMUNITY.icon
I think that's what politics as a technology is all about. For example, in corporate management strategy, there are things like "lobbying" and "secondary voting" to change the law (politics). Previous companies, interviews and appearances related to oneself.icon On the other hand, the media does things like public opinion formation, and I wrote about how to implement it in society in the area where you can spend your lifetime and R&D. Previous companies, interviews and appearances related to oneself.icon I see. Maybe my thinking was shallow. So if I want to do things like secondary voting that I mentioned earlier or implement them in society as I intended, I need to make them more easily understandable and communicable. FPC_COMMUNITY.icon
I feel like I'm somehow connected to Civichat? FPC_COMMUNITY.icon
Yes, that's right!!!!!!! Without this background, I would just be a person with revolutionary spirit, but by doing this in the soil of business, value is created. Previous companies, interviews and appearances related to oneself.icon
I think that the mechanism of making the intermediate layer bear the cost of verification by disclosing information can solve the dilemma mentioned above.
/emoji/twitter.icon Maybe it's the role of laws to design a structure where top management has an incentive to disclose information, etc.
@Previous companies, interviews and appearances related to oneselfPrevious companies, interviews and appearances related to oneself.icon July 22, 2021
Overview of poker app that can be played with friends
/emoji/twitter.icon I thought that it was inevitable that under the current democracy, voting is based on egoism, and it is important to gain as much empathy as possible by making the essence of that "intelligent approach" as transparent as possible without blackboxing it. (Impression) So there may be similarities with the ideology of laws or constitution.
@FPC_COMMUNITYFPC_COMMUNITY.icon July 22, 2021
Exactly, that's what Ideas, Commons, and Common Law are for, to prevent that from happening. Perhaps also something like the Hippocratic Oath.
It's connected to the issue of Intellectual Approach and Populism. The structure was pointed out in New World: 16 wise people from around the world talk about the future as well.
/emoji/twitter.icon The day after President Trump was elected, I saw many people in New York saying the same thing. And I, who had talked to Trump supporters many times in the Midwest and South, had a big change of heart. Democracy is a peaceful revolutionary device that replaces rulers without anyone shedding blood, and this is precisely the power of democracy. https://t.co/1EsBwqAzD3
@tonghwi17tonghwi17.icon November 3, 2021